Grams.) The wedding off Draw MEEKS and you may Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?)

The guy ordered and you can improved here what turned into his family toward second twenty-two years and on this place all the youngsters have been created except the two eldest. Within the 1891 the guy sold so it family and you will ordered section thirty two from inside the cut off 10 regarding four miles northeast away from Chillicothe, which he increased and left since property-stead.

Pledged so you can and you will registered just before me, this twenty-first day of October

His Christian life extended courtesy a time period of more forty years. He kept solidly into the Primitive Baptist faith, hence turned into their entire comfort in his last weeks and by each other precepts and you will analogy he portrayed the best sorts of a keen Western resident.

Draw MEEKS’ second matrimony, to help you Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?),[COMMENT] is actually September 21, 1858 inside Claiborne Parish, Louisiana. You’ll find nothing recognized on the a married relationship to help you a good COHEN aside from the marriage license, registered during the Matrimony Book step 1, webpage 914, details the marriage just like the between age, and you may Sarah produced her mark. The marriage is actually performed from the J. W. McKINZIE, J. P.

T. KERLEY

I, T. T. KERLEY, create solemnly swear that i am 21 years old, and this Miss W. C. MEEKS is 18/eight yrs . old, and this there aren’t any court objections to our Wedding. J. C. WELLS are bound claims your mothers of Miss W. C. MEEKS possess offered the full say yes to the marriage of their daughter to Mr. T.

Sarah and you can Draw resided west of Haynesville in the Claiborne Parish to have a while together with most likely one youngster, Willia Celestia MEEKS, the brand new spouse away from T. The loved ones details signify Willia Celestia MEEKS KERLEY came into this world November 30, 1865, on Guarantee, Bienville Parish, Louisiana, plus the grave marker means a romantic date regarding beginning away from 1865. I suggest, but not, that the date of birth may have actually already been November 30, 1863 instead of one big date within the 1865. Of course, there’s no birth certificate. The latest dying certificate is not any assist, as it suggests a date away from delivery away from November 31, 1886, more than five years pursuing the time from her marriage. It can imply an age at the loss of 52, and since the newest dying happened January 16, 1919, she’d have been produced into the 1866, deciding to make the 1886 probably a good typographical mistake. Meant for various delivery go out, We have around three objections:

• The new census taker-in 1870, functioning August 23, 1870, showed that the new baby’s age is actually 9. When you’re census takers was notoriously crappy during the ages, it’s very uncommon, I do believe, for this young a baby having a delivery date that a distance. It can simply be 36 months wrong with the corrected go out in place of 5 years incorrect with the 1965 day. The new 1880 census taker listed this because the 18, again too old to possess often big date and FortsГ¤tt you will completely wrong due to the fact prior to her relationships, explained lower than, when she was not yet , 18.
• Probably the most significant conflict I’ve ‘s the matrimony licenses, duplicated verbatim on figure ?. There have been two change with the printed form, the initial being the needs the lady become at least you are years of age in place of parental concur, in addition to second becoming the out-old means is printed for usage towards earliest about three digits of your own time are “187”, that’s entered through to tell you a night out together from October 21, 1881. To possess a good November 29th birthday celebration and be seventeen, the year out of beginning should be 1863. In the event that she was really ten in the place of regarding the 1 month shy out of to get, carry out the fresh new clerk has actually approved the term of the groom’s buddy your bride’s mothers accepted the marriage?